🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."